Evaluation of practice nurses' management of paediatric psychosocial problems in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Child mental health services are under major pressure worldwide. In the Netherlands, Youth Mental Health Practice Nurses (YMHPNs) have been introduced in general practice to improve access to care. In this study, we evaluated care delivered by YMHPNs. METHODS: We used medical records of a population-based cohort (21 717 children, 0-17 years). Characteristics of children consulting a YMHPN, type of problem, care delivered by YMHPNs and referrals were assessed using quantitative content analysis. RESULTS: Records of 375 children (mean age 12.9 years, 59.2% girl) were analysed. These children were often in their adolescence (57.3% was between 13 and 17 years), and more often female than male (59.2% vs 40.8%). YMHPNs had a median of four consultations (IQR 2-7) with the child. YMHPNs managed a variety of psychosocial problems. YMHPNs managed 22.4% of children without need of referral, 52.0% were eventually referred for additional care. 13.3% of children dropped out during the treatment trajectory. In the remaining 12.3% of children, the treatment trajectory was stopped because the child was already attending specialized services, the treatment trajectory was still ongoing or the medical record was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: YMHPNs successfully managed one in four children with psychosocial problems without need for referral. Nevertheless, most children were eventually referred for additional care.

GPs' and practice nurses' views on their management of paediatric anxiety problems: an interview study.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety problems are common in both children and adolescents, and many affected children do not receive appropriate treatment. Understaffing of mental healthcare services and long waiting lists form major barriers. In the Netherlands, practice nurses have been introduced into general practice to support general practitioners (GPs) in the management of psychosocial problems. In this study we investigated the views of GPs and practice nurses on their management of paediatric anxiety problems. METHODS: We performed an exploratory study using semi-structured interviews with 13 GPs and 13 practice nurses in the greater Rotterdam area in 2021. Interviews were transcribed and coded into topics, which were categorized per research question. RESULTS: In their management of paediatric anxiety problems, both GPs and practice nurses try to explore the case and the needs of affected children and their parents. GPs rarely follow up affected children themselves. They often refer the child, preferably to their practice nurse. Practice nurses regularly initiate follow-up consultations with affected children themselves. Practice nurses reported using a variety of therapeutic techniques, including elements of cognitive behavioural therapy. In more severe cases, practice nurses refer the child to external mental healthcare services. GPs reported being satisfied with their collaboration with practice nurses. Both GPs and practice nurses experience significant barriers in the management of paediatric anxiety problems. Most importantly, long waiting lists for external mental health care were reported to be a major difficulty. Improving cooperation with external mental healthcare providers was reported to be an important facilitator. CONCLUSIONS: In their management of paediatric anxiety problems, GPs and practice nurses experience major challenges in the cooperation with external mental healthcare providers and in the long waiting lists for these services. GPs and practice nurses believe that thanks to their shared approach more children with anxiety problems can remain treated in general practice. Future research is needed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of the shared efforts of GPs and practice nurses in their management of paediatric anxiety problems.

Anxiety problems in children and adolescents: a population-based cohort study on incidence and management in Dutch primary care.

BACKGROUND: Due to a large strain on youth mental health care, general practice is suggested as an alternative treatment setting for children and adolescents with anxiety problems. However, research on the current management of these children and adolescents within general practice is scarce. AIM: To investigate the incidence of coded anxiety in general practice using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC), and GPs' management of children and adolescents presenting with anxiety problems. DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based cohort study using electronic medical records of 51 212 children (aged 0-17 years) in primary care in the Rotterdam region between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018. METHOD: Incidence of ICPC codes for anxiety were calculated, then the characteristics of children and adolescents consulting their GP with anxiety and the GPs' management were assessed qualitatively using quantitative content analysis. RESULTS: Incidence of ICPC codes for anxiety in children and adolescents was 5.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.02 to 5.71) per 1000 person-years. Adolescent females had the highest incidence with 14.01 (95% CI = 12.55 to 15.58) per 1000 person-years. Of the 381 children and adolescents consulting their GP with an initial anxiety problem (median age 13.3 years, 40.4% male), GPs referred 59.3% to mental health care in the first year while 26.5% of children and adolescents were managed by a specialised practice nurse within general practice. Of the 381 children and adolescents, 10.5% received psychiatric medication during the first year, with the trend being for increased prescriptions during adolescence. CONCLUSION: In general practice children and adolescents frequently received one of two ICPC codes for anxiety, especially adolescent females. Most presenting to their GP with anxiety problems are referred externally or seen by a specialised practice nurse within general practice.

Increase in atopic sensitization rate among Dutch children with symptoms of allergic disease between 1994 and 2014.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of symptoms of allergic diseases has increased significantly during the last decades. However, studies into time trends of atopic sensitization among children are limited and have focused on aeroallergen sensitization. We aimed to investigate time trends in the prevalence and degree of atopic sensitization to inhalant and food allergens among children (0-17 years) with symptoms of allergic disease. METHODS: Sensitization data of all children tested in our clinical laboratory during 1994-2014 were analyzed. Sensitization was detected using the ImmunoCAP system and defined as a specific IgE level of ≥0.35 kU/L. Trends in sensitization rates to 5 food and 5 aeroallergens for different age categories were investigated with logistic regression, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Sensitization data of 18 199 children were analyzed. Between 1994 and 2014, a steady and statistically significant increase in overall sensitization rate was found (from 40.5% in 1994 to 48.9% in 2014, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.01 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.01, P = .003). This increase in sensitization rate was mainly explained by increasing aeroallergen sensitization among 4- to 11-year-old children (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.02, P < .001). We found no increase in sensitization rates to food and aeroallergens in other age categories. The degree of sensitization did not change significantly during the study period (all tests P > .15). CONCLUSION: We observed a statistically significant increase in sensitization rate between 1994 and 2014 among children with symptoms of allergic disease. This was mainly explained by increasing aeroallergen sensitization among 4- to 11-year-olds.